Obama’s ex-military chief flare-up of Iran’s nuclear Strategy

A previous top military intelligence official under President Obama on Wednesday blasted the government permit of a nuclear agreement with Iran, calling it a “placeholder” stand on “wishful thinking.”

Obama’s ex-military chief flare-up of Iran’s nuclear Strategy

Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, ex- head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, he convey points and detailed criticism of the Iran deal structure as well as also the U.S. reaction to the brutality in Iraq and Syria. He told a House Foreign Affair subcommittee, “It is obvious that the nuclear deal is not a permanent fix but just a placeholder.”

In written and bring evidence, he said the 10 year timeframe on parts of the deal “only makes sense” if the U.S. thinks a “broad settlement” with Iran is possible. He adding that command change is the best way to stop Iran’s nuclear weapons program he called this “wishful thinking.”

Flynn also claimed that Iran has “every target” of building a nuclear weapon, and their wish to wipe out the Israel is very real. Iran has not once supply to the greater good of the security of the state, Flynn also said, noting their armed forces “killed or injured thousands of Americans and Iraqis” in Iraq.

The government is working along with five other world powers to try and strike a nuclear deal, which would want to control Tehran’s nuclear program in trade for permit relief by the end of the month. But Flynn said Iran already has made it clear they will put limits on checkup, making for “incomplete proof.” He also said, it is “difficult” to consider international authorized could be start again once pick up.

He also repeat anxiety of some other analysts in saying the “apparent acceptance” of Iran’s program will to be expected “touch off a risky domino effect in the state” as Saudi Arabia and other nations look for nuclear potential.

As for the rising threat front by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, Flynn voiced worry that the U.S. is not keeping up with the disaster. He said there are completely no end in view and no clear U.S. policy for dealing with it.

Experts said in statements distributed on Tuesday that not a single country has reported any violations of an arms ban against Iran, perhaps the result of a political decision to pass up any “negative aspect” on discussions to lead in Tehran’s nuclear program.


Article Author Details

Dan Nicholson

Senior editor at The World beast. Follow Tweets by @DanNicholson001

  • Gwen

    So, a MILITARY GENERAL criticizes a deal which avoids a shooting war??? That’s so odd!!! But of course, we can’t question whether he gets bribes from Big Defense contractors…